AGIR






OUTILS LIBRES

browsers
Firefox
messengers
Jappix - Thunderbird
search
Duckduckgo - Quaero - Scroogle
servers
all2all - domaine public - Telekommunisten
networks
Appleseed - Crabgrass - Diaspora - elgg - OneSocialWeb - pip.io
microblog
identi.ca

RELATED SITES

Ada Lovelace Institute - AI Now - Algorithm Watch - Algorithmic Justice League - AlgoTransparency - Atlas of Surveillance - Big Brother Watch - Citizen Lab - Conspiracy Watch - Constantvzw - controle-tes-donnees.net - Data Detox Kit - Digital Freedom Fund - Domaine Public - Do Not Track Electronic Frontier Foundation - europe-v-facebook - Fight for the Future - Forbidden Stories - Gender Shades - Google Spleen - en.greatfire.org - hiljade.kamera.rs - Homo Digitalis - Human Rights Watch - Inside Google - Inside Airbnb - Liberties - LobbyPlag - Make Amazon Pay - Feminist Data Manifest-No- myshadow.org - Naked Citizens - Ni pigeons, ni espions - No-CCTV - Non à l’Etat fouineur - Nothing to Hide - noyb - NURPA - Online Nudity Survey - Open Rights Group - Ordinateurs de Vote - Pixel de tracking - Police spies out of lives - Prism Break - Privacy.net - Privacy International - Privacy Project - La Quadrature du Net - Radical AI Project - Reset the Net - Save the Internet - Souriez vous êtes filmés - Sous surveillance - Spyfiles - StateWatch - Stop Amazon - Stop Data Retention - Stop Killer Robots - Stop Spying - Stop The Cyborgs - Stop the Internet Blacklist ! - Stop the Spies - Stop Watching Us - Sur-ecoute.org - Technopolice - Tech Transparency Project - Transparency Toolkit - URME Surveillance - Watching Alibaba - Where are the Eyes ? - Who Targets Me ? - Wikifémia - Wikileaks

Web

Advocate General’s Opinion : national security mass retention regimes are incompatible with EU Law | PI

plainte - 16 janvier 2020

lire sur le site originel >>> (Advocate General’s Opinion : national security mass retention regimes are incompatible with EU Law | PI)

Wednesday, January 15, 2020 Today Advocate General (AG) Campos Sánchez-Bordona of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), issued his opinions (C-623/17, C-511/18 and C-512/18 and C-520/18) on how he believes the Court should rule on vital questions relating to the conditions under which security and intelligence agencies in the UK, France and Belgium could have access to communications data retained by telecommunications providers.
The AG addressed two major questions : (1) When (...)



Mots-clés de l'article

Belgique - CJUE - Europe - France - législation - Royaume-Uni - surveillance - BigData - GCHQ - LoisurleRenseignement-France - MI5 - PrivacyInternational - privacyinternational.org -

VOIR TOUS LES MOTS-CLÉS