AGIR






OUTILS LIBRES

browsers
Firefox
messengers
Jappix - Thunderbird
search
Duckduckgo - Quaero - Scroogle
servers
all2all - domaine public - Telekommunisten
networks
Appleseed - Crabgrass - Diaspora - elgg - OneSocialWeb - pip.io
microblog
identi.ca

RELATED SITES

Ada Lovelace Institute - AI Now - Algorithm Watch - Algorithmic Justice League - AlgoTransparency - Atlas of Surveillance - Big Brother Watch - Citizen Lab - Conspiracy Watch - Constantvzw - controle-tes-donnees.net - Data Detox Kit - Digital Freedom Fund - Domaine Public - Do Not Track Electronic Frontier Foundation - europe-v-facebook - Fight for the Future - Forbidden Stories - Gender Shades - Google Spleen - greatfire.org - Guard//Int - hiljade.kamera.rs - Homo Digitalis - Human Rights Watch - Inside Google - Inside Airbnb - Liberties - LobbyPlag - Make Amazon Pay - Manifest-No - Ministry of Privacy - More Perfect Union - myshadow.org - Naked Citizens - Ni pigeons, ni espions - No-CCTV - Non à l’Etat fouineur - Nothing to Hide - noyb - NURPA - Online Nudity Survey - Open Rights Group - Ordinateurs de Vote - Pixel de tracking - Police spies out of lives - Prism Break - Privacy.net - Privacy International - Privacy Project - La Quadrature du Net - Radical AI Project - Reset the Net - Save the Internet - Souriez vous êtes filmés - Sous surveillance - Spyfiles - StateWatch - Stop Amazon - Stop Data Retention - Stop Killer Robots - Stop Spying - Stop The Cyborgs - Stop the Internet Blacklist ! - Stop the Spies - Stop Watching Us - Sur-ecoute.org - Technopolice - Tech Transparency Project - Transparency Toolkit - URME Surveillance - Watching Alibaba - Where are the Eyes ? - Who Targets Me ? - Wikifémia - Wikileaks

Société

Opinion | You Are Now Remotely Controlled - The New York Times

analyse - 26 janvier 2020

lire sur le site originel >>> (Opinion | You Are Now Remotely Controlled - The New York Times)

Surveillance capitalists control the science and the scientists, the secrets and the truth.
The debate on privacy and law at the Federal Trade CommissionClose X was unusually heated that day. Tech industry executives “argued that they were capable of regulating themselves and that government intervention would be costly and counterproductive.” Civil libertarians warned that the companies’ data capabilities posed “an unprecedented threat to individual freedom.” One observed, “We have to decide (...)



Mots-clés de l'article

manipulation - algorithme - Australie - biométrie - Chine - comportement - domination - émotions - facial - NouvelleZélande - prédiction - publicité - reconnaissance - Royaume-Uni - santé - surveillance - technologisme - USA - voyageurs - Amazon - BigData - Canada - DoD - Facebook - Ford - FTC - GigEconomy - Google - GoogleSearch - Islam - marketing - Microsoft - nytimes.com - profiling - scraping -

VOIR TOUS LES MOTS-CLÉS