AGIR






OUTILS LIBRES

browsers
Firefox
messengers
Jappix - Thunderbird
search
Duckduckgo - Quaero - Scroogle
servers
all2all - domaine public - Telekommunisten
networks
Appleseed - Crabgrass - Diaspora - elgg - OneSocialWeb - pip.io
microblog
identi.ca

RELATED SITES

Ada Lovelace Institute - AI Now - Algorithm Watch - Algorithmic Justice League - AlgoTransparency - Atlas of Surveillance - Big Brother Watch - Citizen Lab - Conspiracy Watch - Constantvzw - controle-tes-donnees.net - Data Detox Kit - Digital Freedom Fund - Domaine Public - Do Not Track Electronic Frontier Foundation - europe-v-facebook - Fight for the Future - Forbidden Stories - Gender Shades - Google Spleen - greatfire.org - Guard//Int - hiljade.kamera.rs - Homo Digitalis - Human Rights Watch - Inside Google - Inside Airbnb - Liberties - LobbyPlag - Make Amazon Pay - Manifest-No - Ministry of Privacy - More Perfect Union - myshadow.org - Naked Citizens - Ni pigeons, ni espions - No-CCTV - Non à l’Etat fouineur - Nothing to Hide - noyb - NURPA - Online Nudity Survey - Open Rights Group - Ordinateurs de Vote - Pixel de tracking - Police spies out of lives - Prism Break - Privacy.net - Privacy International - Privacy Project - La Quadrature du Net - Radical AI Project - Reset the Net - Save the Internet - Souriez vous êtes filmés - Sous surveillance - Spyfiles - StateWatch - Stop Amazon - Stop Data Retention - Stop Killer Robots - Stop Spying - Stop The Cyborgs - Stop the Internet Blacklist ! - Stop the Spies - Stop Watching Us - Sur-ecoute.org - Technopolice - Tech Transparency Project - Transparency Toolkit - URME Surveillance - Watching Alibaba - Where are the Eyes ? - Who Targets Me ? - Wikifémia - Wikileaks

Web

CJEU Judgment - First Statement

analyse - 17 juillet 2020

lire sur le site originel >>> (noyb.eu)

CJEU invalidates “Privacy Shield” in US Surveillance case. SCCs cannot be used by Facebook and similar companies.
Facebook and similar companies may also not use "SCCs" to transfer data as DPC must stop transfers under this instrument. Schrems : “We need US surveillance reform. The Court has clarified that there cannot be any transfer of data in violation of EU law.”
Max Schrems’ (chair of noyb.eu and party to the case) first reaction to the judgment :
Schrems : “I am very happy about the (...)



Mots-clés de l'article

CJUE - données - Europe - procès - RGPD - surveillance - USA - BigData - GAFAM - noyb.eu - PrivacyShield - SafeHarbor -

VOIR TOUS LES MOTS-CLÉS